Copy Editor Stupidity
Nov. 30th, 2012 11:11 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I know at least one of my LJ friends will have sympathy with this one. I’ve received the proofs for a new journal article(*). While most of the comments are reasonable there’s a pair that are rather stupid when taken together. In the paper we reference this paper:
Dick , A . R . and Brooks , M . J . ( 2003 ) Issues in automated visual surveillance . In: Sun e t al (eds .) .
which as anyone who udnerstands referencing can see then cross-references:
Sun , C . , Talbot , H . , Ourselin , S . and Adriaansen , T . (eds). ( 2003 ) Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications, DICTA 2003, 10 – 12 December 2003, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia . CSIRO Publishing .
The copy editors have separately asked:
Please provide further publication details in the reference Dick and Brooks (2003).
and:
Reference Sun et al (2003) not cited in the text. Please cite in the text, else delete from the reference list.
Argh!
(*) From my web page “News” section about this paper: A joint paper with Dr James Ferryman of the School of Systems Engineering, University of Reading has just been accepted by Security Journal. The pre-print of The Future of Video Analystics for Surveillance and Its Ethical Implications is available from the The Open Depot.

Originally published at blog.a-cubed.info |